FANDOM

Nixerix

aka Nikki

Admin Chat moderator
  • I live in Canada
  • I was born on July 28
  • My occupation is Nurse
  • I am Female
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Could you delete this article I made which is called cloth (ttott) I just realized that there is already an article like this, sorry for asking. Anyway thanks

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey, I'm new here, was wondering how something should be formatted. So in the japanese version of Trio of Towns, one of Ford's name choices for his daughter is リン, which is the Japanese word for Phosphorous. The English version changes that option to Marie (in reference to Marie Curie).

    Should I replace Rin/Lynn (リン) with Marie on the page, and maybe make a note in a reference/trivia section at the bottom of the page?

      Loading editor
    • That's a really great question! I'd just make a note for now, I think. I know nothing about how things translate to Japanese, but putting in a trivia section is always a safe bet! 

        Loading editor
    • Okay, I've added in a trivia section like you suggested! Thanks for your help.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey,
    I'm writing this as a continuation of this thread. Apparently, it looks like the infoboxes aren't portable anymore, old drafts were either approved and then reverted by Mai (for reasons I couldn't find in edit summaries or walls of either of you) or deleted by you after some time, also for unknown reasons. Related CSS was removed as well. I managed to make portable drafts again and here's a side-by-side comparison of them (to spare you having to import my common.css and then view my sandbox afterwards). What was the reason for reverting them last time and do you think they could be applied again?

    And no, I'm not a Vanguard member nor I'm representing them.

    Cheers!

      Loading editor
    • View all 8 replies
    • So far, I can't see any issues. I've visted a page containing each of the infoboxes, and they all seemed to have been reverted over smoothly with no issues! 

        Loading editor
    • Sounds good to me :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there, Nix! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted you to know that Aurelia's page is pretty much done! I don't know how to remove the stub saying that it needs more information or even how to say that it doesn't need a cleanup. When you find time will you be able to take care of it for me? 

      Loading editor
  • Wow, this is a weird subject. The page that was created for Princess Vanilla. I looked fer up and the only information I can find is this Reddit thread:

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/harvestmoon/comments/3wwxu8/harvest_moon_64_unfinished_characterevent_bonus/

    I cleaned up the page a bit but I want to leave it up to you to decide if she's legit or not.

      Loading editor
  • What should we put in the parentheses for Light of Hope pages? I was thinking

    Title (LoH)

    But I want an approval first. Also, a Navbox needs made for the game.

      Loading editor
  • I'm not sure if you still are active on here or are into HM anymore, but lately I've seen that certain people and sites claim that Castanet, the setting in Harvest Moon: Animal Parade, is an island. All this time, for the 4+ irl years I've been playing the game, I believed that Castanet was the name of a large portion of the continent where Animal Parade took place. If it is true that Castanet is an island, may you direct in me towards the evidence that proved that Castanet is Ann island? Thank you very much, and thank you especially for contributing so much to the Harvest Moon fandom. (Also, I'm deeply in love with Bo as well; I SOO wish she was a bachelor... :()

      Loading editor
  • Thank you for helping me on the powerberries article and teaching me that articles aren't supposed to be written with ect or I did this. Just wanted to say thanks  

      Loading editor
  • Hey, I recently came on and had a question but found the commenting is turned off. Any reason for this?

      Loading editor
    • Commenting where? If you're talking about the commenting people can make at the bottom of a page, we've had that turned off for a few years now probably at this point. The reasoning was that it was a breeding ground for spam, people arguing, spoiler, etc. If you want to ask a question, ask it in the page's talk page. You could also ask at the help desk or on our walls. :) 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello! I'm Wowa, and I'm representing Fandom's Vanguard team. We're users who volunteer to help communities adopt to new technologies and features, like content portability. We've identified your community as a high priority for introducing the Portable Infobox tool, which has a lot of benefits for your community. Rather than get into all of the metrics and numbers (though I can present some of those if you're interested), I'll keep it simple. I'd like upgrade the Infobox templates themselves so that they can be accessible on any current and future platform. Maintaining them if you want to make changes should be very simple.

    I've added drafts for all of your current infoboxes which you can modify or approve early if you'd like. I've put the styling here. Here's a full list of all the drafts:

    Everything should work properly as set up, so if we don't hear back from you, we'll assume there were no problems and will come back and approve the work as-is on or after March 10.

    Also, if you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Thanks!

      Loading editor
    • View all 27 replies
    • I think that we are in a unique situation where the images we do have can't really be displayed in a higher quality. Very few images exist of characters for the infoboxes, and the ones we have are usually the best ones that are available. Images could be resized possibly and re-uploaded. I'm not sure how the rest of the community feels, but I think that the way it is now is still better than limiting it to 100px. It's just a matter of fixing some images than, as a lot of them do look pretty good the way that they are in full size. Rather than having all of the images across the board limited to the very small size at 100px. 

        Loading editor
    • I agree. Reworking 50+ images (at least that's my approximation) would be quite a bit of work, so it can be reduced to editing those few images that cause problems. I'll leave the current code then as it is, so the images will stay full-width!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message